KOMPETENSI PUSTAKAWAN DALAM PEMENUHAN KEBUTUHAN INFORMASI GURU BESAR: STUDI KASUS DI UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

  • Kalarensi Naibaho Perpustakaan Universitas Indonesia
  • Mariyah Mariyah Perpustakaan Universitas Indonesia
Keywords: Librarian Competences, Academic Librarian, Reference Librarian, Reference Services

Abstract

Professor is one of UI's group of users who get special services. This service is called EDS (E-resources Delivery Services) aimed at helping professors meet literacy needs. Librarians download and post specific articles related to the subject of specialization of the professors. During 2016, the response of professors served by EDS is quite encouraging. This study aims to examine how the fulfillment of literature needs of professors in UI and the competence of librarians expected by the professor. The method used is quantitative and qualitative. EDS 2016 performance data is used to analyze EDS productivity. Interview and analysis of professors' responses via e-mail are used to analyze the competence of librarians. The results of the analysis indicate that the professor hopes that UI Library has reference librarian that serves as a competent subject specialist and article submission through continuous EDS as well as relevant to the research topic. Librarians should utilize contacts with assistant professors as they have data and information about the research being conducted. The referral service needs to have a competent team as a reference librarian. Referral librarians should have a wide network with various universities outside UI, especially institutions that have resources that are not owned by UI. The UI library needs to initiate a pattern of cooperation that allows librarians to be involved in the research teams of professors, as literature providers, and to rearrange the delivery schedule of articles by referral librarians, adjusted for the time required for the literature.

References

Beagle, Donald (1999). “Conceptualizing an Information Commons,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 25, no. 2 (1999): 82.

Bryan Sinclair. (2009) “The Blended Librarian in the Learning Commons: New Skills for the Blended Library,” College & Research Libraries News 70, no. 9: 504.

Dervin, B. (1992). From the Mind’s Eye of the User: The Sense-Making Qualitative-Quantitative Methodology. Glazier and Powell.

Ivana Hebrang Grgic dan Daniela Zivkovic (2012). Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML) 3: 247 – 256.

James C. Haug. (2008). “Learning Curve: Adapting Library Workspaces,” Educause Quarterly 31, no. 4:70.

Katz, William & Ruth A. Fraley, ed. (1984). Evaluation of Reference Services. New York: The Haworth Press.

Kay Ann Cassell. (1999). Developing Reference Collections and Services in an Electronic Age: A How-To-Do-It Manual for Librarians. New York: Neal-Schuman, 1999: 47.

Magali Carrera, Donna Massano, and Sharon Weiner. (2008). UMass Dartmouth LC Planning Committee, Final Report, February 2008 http://library.umassd.edu/libraryinfo/learningcommons/LC_ FinalReportFeb2008.pdf

Mary M. Somerville and Navjit Brar. (2010). “Collaborative CoDesign: The Cal Poly Digital Teaching Library User Centric Approach,” http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1031&context=lib_fac

Saracevic, T., Kantor, P., Chamis, A.Y., & Trivison, D. (1988). “A study of information seeking and retrieving: background and methodology” dalam Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39, 161-76.

Scott Bennett. (2003). Libraries Designed for Learning. Washington, D.C.: Council on Library and Information Resources, 2003: 38.

Steven Bell and John Shank. (2004). “The Blended Librarian: A Blueprint for Redesigning the Teaching and Learning Role of Academic Librarians,” College & Research Libraries News 65, no. 7 (July/Aug. 2004): 374.

Taylor, R. S. (1968). “Question negotiation and information seeking in libraries” dalam College and Research Libraries, 29, 178-189.
Published
2018-05-30
How to Cite
Naibaho, K., & Mariyah, M. (2018). KOMPETENSI PUSTAKAWAN DALAM PEMENUHAN KEBUTUHAN INFORMASI GURU BESAR: STUDI KASUS DI UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA. Jurnal IPI (Ikatan Pustakawan Indonesia), 3(1), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.1234/jurnal ipi.v3i1.17
Section
articles